logo

More jurisprudence

 



malyari
More jurisprudence
   

Supreme Court voids creation of Shariff Kabunsuan By Jesus F. Llanto abs-cbnNEWS.com/Newsbreak The Supreme Court has declared the creation of the province of Shariff Kabunsuan in the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao void and ruled that the power of ARMM’s legislature to create provinces and cities is unconstitutional. The SC, in an 8-6 vote, declared void Muslim Mindanao Autonomy Act 201, which created the province of Shariff Kabunsuan, which was carved out of Maguindanao province... read more

Published : 5 months, 3 weeks ago (Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:08:32 PDT)
http://malyari.livejournal.com/13978.html   (Cached)   0 links
malyari

  

real_philosophy
The Philosophy of Law Part VII: Feminist Jurisprudence
   

Like critical legal studies, feminist jurisprudence is a critical response to traditional jurisprudence. Unlike CLS, which criticizes power and class relations, feminist jurisprudence generally addresses two concerns: (1) law as patriarchy and (2) women's issues in the law. Another key distinction between feminist jurisprudence (FJ) and CLS is that FJ does not usually call for a break with traditional notions of law, policy-making and adjudication. In this respect, it is less "radical," although...
read more

Published : 1 year, 2 months ago (Tue, 23 Oct 2007 14:52:25 PDT)
http://community.livejournal.com/real_philosophy/427575.html   0 links
real_philosophy



erringwildly
Where would we be without California?
   

http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/05/15/same.sex.marriage/index.html California Ban on Gay Marriage Struck Down Or for a more analytical (and more interesting I think) article by a Yale Law Professor, try this one:  http://www.slate.com/id/2191530/ Yes, Massachusets did this a few years ago, and it didn't do much, but in the Mass decision, marriage licenses were only available to residents, not to nonresidents whose states did not accept licenses.  However, the California case concluded that nonresidents...
read more


Tags: california gay marriage jurisprudence politics

Published : 7 months, 4 weeks ago (Thu, 15 May 2008 20:27:30 PDT)
http://erringwildly.livejournal.com/8270.html   (Cached)   0 links
erringwildly


pseydtonne
About Prop 8 in California versus civil unions and all that jazz
   

I need to bring this up while it's fresh in my mind. I also need to eat breakfast, even though I've been awake for two and a half hours. Lots of folks are upset that Proposition Eight passed in California. This makes gay marriage illegal again in that state. The theory floating around is that the black community turned out in droves to vote but that community is mostly against gay marriage because of its religious roots. I haven't studied the numbers yet, so I hope it's something slightly more complex...
read more


Tags: common law vs canon law civil union hot legal action jurisprudence proposition 8 elvii teh ghey gay marriage pacs

Published : 2 months ago (Thu, 06 Nov 2008 09:13:40 PST)
http://pseydtonne.livejournal.com/223806.html   (Cached)   0 links
pseydtonne


pressreleases
Comelec denies petition of Bacoor mayoral candidate
   

Comelec denies petition of Bacoor mayoral candidate              The Commission on Elections (Comelec) has denied for lack of merit a petition filed by Edwin E. Malvar, a mayoral candidate in the last local elections in Bacoor, Cavite who questioned the legality of an order of Regional Trial Court Judge Matias M. Garcia II of Branch 19 dismissing his election protest against Bacoor Mayor Strike B. Revilla.               The Comelec, through its first division...
read more


Tags: judge george garcia strike revilla supreme court melanie sia appeal law comm. browner jurisdiction election protests mayoralty comelec election rtc mandamus mayor grave abuse. judge garcia edwin malvar cavite jurisprudence election protest certiorari bacoor

Published : 1 week, 5 days ago (Sat, 27 Dec 2008 06:19:26 PST)
http://pressreleases.livejournal.com/528.html   (Cached)   0 links
pressreleases


the_redness
The First Errant Rambling!
   

I’m taking Indian Law, because it’s really one of the most interesting subjects in all of American law, and the professor asked a question that I couldn’t put out of my head: how has the concept of Indian sovereignty evolved (as from the Marshall Trilogy and Ex Parte Crow Dog to Kagama, Sandoval, and like cases). Johnson v. M’Intosh, 21 U.S. 543: Essentially, Indian sales of land to settlers either not recognized by U.S. courts or revoked by later treaty (there are ‘alternate’ holdings; the more...
read more


Tags: nerd indian law

Published : 1 year, 10 months ago (Sat, 24 Feb 2007 15:37:20 PST)
http://the-redness.livejournal.com/887.html   (Cached)   0 links
the_redness

  More related posts

Related searches

Weep No More My Lady
Because Faced More Uncertainty Worry
Arsenal Counter More Veto
More Useful Everyday
One More Try Lyric
Once More Unto The Breach
Client Danger More Warns
Relient K More Than Useless
Among Bank More Signifies Unwillingness
Data Disk More Wiping
Abortion More Restriction Uphold
More
Before Client Crash More Warns
Philosophy
Fire More Package Veto
En Language Library More Upstairs Walk
Co Mime More Unexpected
More Possibility Vetoed Vote
Employing More Practice Salesman Unlike
Concern More Reinforces Volatility

 
Copyright © 2005 ljseek.com This service is not affiliated with LiveJournal.com
Design by Steorra.com